Students to protest over funding cuts and employment prospects

There’s at least some preprotest coverage in the press this morning.

Although it’s good to see the NUS taking a lead here and not giving up like Porter did after the 2010 vote, I can’t help but agree with the points made by the student interviewed in the short piece in the Guardian.

Conrad Landin, a second-year English student at Cambridge University, said he planned to attend despite being kettled in Whitehall during one of the 2010 protests, when he was a sixth-former. He said: “It was one of the scariest experiences of my life, it felt like being in prison – it was so unjustified because there had been very little disorder before that point.

“It was only after people were imprisoned in a very small place that people started clashing with the police. People started fires to keep warm at zero temperatures. There was no food, water or toilets. It wasn’t just students there – there were elderly people, disabled people, young children who weren’t being allowed out. It seemed very immoral, inhumane treatment.”

Landin said he was principally protesting against tuition fees and for the return of the EMA, adding that marchers were not all backing the NUS’s official line. He said: “Motivating people to come out is difficult because of the resistance we’re still seeing from the NUS. They’ve got this slogan, Educate, Employ, Empower, which is the most vacuous thing I’ve ever heard. We’re not going to make a case for the value of education and supporting vulnerable young people unless we have some clear demands.”

Yes, there needs to be some clear demands! Some lessons from the Canadian protests are needed.

The march route is also ineffective. The NCAFC march through the City last time was a much better idea in terms of impact. A bigger number of students taking that route would have worked well. But let’s see how this one goes…

















Read piece in the Guardian

About Virality

Tony D. Sampson is Reader in Digital Culture and Communications at the University of East London. He has a PhD in social-cultural-digital contagion theory from the Sociology Department at the University of Essex. He is a former art student who re-entered higher education in the UK as a mature student in the mid-1990s after a long stint as a gigging musician. His career in education has moved through various disciplines and departments, including a maths and computing faculty, sociology department and school of digital media and design His publications include The Spam Book, coedited with Jussi Parikka (Hampton Press, 2009), Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks (University of Minnesota Press, 2012), The Assemblage Brain: Sense Making in Neuroculture (University of Minnesota Press, 2016), Affect and Social Media (Rowman and Littlefield, July 2018) and The Sleepwalker's Guide to Social Media (due 2020 with Polity Press). Tony is the organizer and host of the Affect and Social Media conferences in the UK (see archive on this blog). As a co-founder and co-director of the public engagement initiatives, Club Critical Theory (CCT) and the Cultural Engine Research Group (CERG), Tony has been project lead on a number of funded projects that bring impactful critical theories into the community and local political sphere to approach. These activities have included large conferences, symposia and informal lectures/workshops in pubs and community centres, co-organized with community groups and local authorities. Tony occasionally blogs at: Full academic profile:
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s